ILF4LYF
https://ns2.ilovefuzz.com/
I'm an economist. You could model it like unemployment. Its accuracy would depend largely on how well you could quantify the different features of a pedal. So, you could make a model, estimate the parameters of the model using jwar's previous purchase history, and then use that model to predict when he would sell a given pedal. But I doubt you could really quantify the parameters of the pedal in a meaningful way...Brandsmannen wrote:Depends on the circuit I suppose. The probability of a big muff getting flipped for a different big muff is quite high, I would believepsychic vampire. wrote:I was going to say, i think the only thing an economist might be able to predict with any semblance of accuracy is when an individual consumer might flip a pedal, because there's probably a direct correlation/causation going on with the individual's economic situation and purchasing habits.Brandsmannen wrote:Just because I have a beef with economics I ftfyIommic Pope wrote: No economist can predict with any degree of accuracy anything.
Yeah, but that's the problem with the original model too kind of. I basically learned all my economics by thinking of it relating to the pedals and amps market. Like a big muff clone was the only perfect substitute for a big muff that I could think of, different models for savings in two periods could be related to amp purchases etc. so I suppose there would be instances where pedal economics is a relevant field of study. Tbh I'd rather study that than economics relating to the real world or whatever they/we deal withwfs1234 wrote:I'm an economist. You could model it like unemployment. Its accuracy would depend largely on how well you could quantify the different features of a pedal. So, you could make a model, estimate the parameters of the model using jwar's previous purchase history, and then use that model to predict when he would sell a given pedal. But I doubt you could really quantify the parameters of the pedal in a meaningful way...Brandsmannen wrote:Depends on the circuit I suppose. The probability of a big muff getting flipped for a different big muff is quite high, I would believepsychic vampire. wrote:I was going to say, i think the only thing an economist might be able to predict with any semblance of accuracy is when an individual consumer might flip a pedal, because there's probably a direct correlation/causation going on with the individual's economic situation and purchasing habits.Brandsmannen wrote:Just because I have a beef with economics I ftfyIommic Pope wrote: No economist can predict with any degree of accuracy anything.
So, if I understand you, dibs.jwar wrote: HAH! That would be just wrong. This kind of stuff is a keeper. I really am honored to be asked in the first place.
I flip out of want to try other things and to pay off previous purchases..etc.
This was exactly my point.Chankgeez wrote:Are you guys really debating if an economist can predict jwar flips? Ain't nobody can predict that shit. This's jwar we're talkin' about.
I would read the shit out of that study.wfs1234 wrote:I'm an economist. You could model it like unemployment. Its accuracy would depend largely on how well you could quantify the different features of a pedal. So, you could make a model, estimate the parameters of the model using jwar's previous purchase history, and then use that model to predict when he would sell a given pedal. But I doubt you could really quantify the parameters of the pedal in a meaningful way...Brandsmannen wrote:Depends on the circuit I suppose. The probability of a big muff getting flipped for a different big muff is quite high, I would believepsychic vampire. wrote:I was going to say, i think the only thing an economist might be able to predict with any semblance of accuracy is when an individual consumer might flip a pedal, because there's probably a direct correlation/causation going on with the individual's economic situation and purchasing habits.Brandsmannen wrote:Just because I have a beef with economics I ftfyIommic Pope wrote: No economist can predict with any degree of accuracy anything.
SS/BS mini. I have both and usually have at least one guitar tuned to C standard or drop C. I know it's not baritone low but they both sound amazing.gnomethrone wrote:When the boner twitches gear must flip.
But yo, I have a gas question: my main board is perfect for what I've been doing but my new baritone guitar demands a new board. So far I've got some fuzz and verb and the eldritch horror of the generation loss, but I need a dirty drive pedal. I know the answer is always fuck overdrive but have you guys used it for low tunings? I'm in dropped a. Thnx.
They stand apart enough. The Mini's pre-distortion eq and constant bias control give a lot more tones than the Fuck, but the Fuck has that crackle that gives it a sounds that's all of its own.gnomethrone wrote:Would you recommend the mini over the fuck? I thought they were the same and really want some of dat crackle. For this board my goal is to have as many momentary weirdness switches as possible.
Imagine a Fuck/Mini with the Mini's pre-distortion and the fuck's crackle switch.Inconuucl wrote:They stand apart enough. The Mini's pre-distortion eq and constant bias control give a lot more tones than the Fuck, but the Fuck has that crackle that gives it a sounds that's all of its own.gnomethrone wrote:Would you recommend the mini over the fuck? I thought they were the same and really want some of dat crackle. For this board my goal is to have as many momentary weirdness switches as possible.