ilovefuzz.com

I also have the supermoon chrome. It does go 100% wet.

ax for the sake of the comp that was what i rolled. in my rape chamber its

2203 into gflex with greenbacks
superbass into 4 marshall cabs
ad140 into cerwin vega.

typically 2203 is boosted wirh an overdive the super gets a fuzz or 2 and the ad is the superbasses bitch.

whiskey_face wrote:ax for the sake of the comp that was what i rolled. in my rape chamber its

2203 into gflex with greenbacks
superbass into 4 marshall cabs
ad140 into cerwin vega.

typically 2203 is boosted wirh an overdive the super gets a fuzz or 2 and the ad is the superbasses bitch.

Very nice. Probably how I would do it if I had your gear

Parker, I'll keep an eye out. Probably will need to do some homework first.
looks like I'll be learning about turntables now

conky. dat rig guh!

CaptainBoxman wrote:ABY pedal that isn't shit, but doesn't cost an arm and a leg?

http://www.roadrageprogear.com/aby_pedal.html

I use this one. When I bought from them, it wasn;t a kit, but came fully built. I could have saved myself 50 bucks.

Has a ground lift switch, and the best layout for an ABY ever.

two footswitches. One for A, One for B. None of this A/B and Both bullshit that I can never remember mid show.

conky wrote:

Forgot a second cable so I wasn't able to run a dual rig but the Matamp on its own sounds so huge.

I hate you and love you at the same time.

Two cheap 412s are floating around and I'm finding the temptation to sell my orange 212 and nab one of them to refit with decent speakers too much to resist.
One is a laney GS412IS. $250AU. Has shitty cel. 70/80s.
The other is a Hiwatt HG412, that moose already poopooed, but is made out of ply and identical in dimensions and features to the expensive hiwatt cabs. Probably also made in china, but everything (almost) we get on the Oz market is. Could get it for $300, has hiwatt not-faners in it. (Moose, I know you know your shit, but construction-wise, I'm finding it real hard to split the diff on those hiwatt cabs. Both are the same ply according to the hiwatt site, the cheap one has segmented internal bracing behind the front baffle, but seems to be in all the critical spots. However I've seen new orange cabs with the same technique, so I dunno what to go with there. Seems like the same shit, just without a primo label. From what I can tell from wordworking dudes is that dovetails and the like don't really make a cab stronger, they just look good, moot point here as: tolex. If they even do that on their fancy expensive new ones.)
Ok, so that's gonna start some arguments.
I know what whiskey and summit are gonna say...I'm kinda with them.
But if there's something critically wrong with them, like they were made in a death labour camp where Black Sabbath records were burnt while the Old Testament was read then I won't go there.

Since my main pedalboard is now packed up as I'm taking to rehearsals every week, i thought i needed something small to leave on the amp for nightly practice...so out came the stock standard big muff, which i fell out of love with ages ago.

now, I'm not sure if its the guitar...or the amp...the speakers...or the combination of all these things together...but damn...the Big Muff sounded absolutely huge!!!

I love the standard muff sound.
Its just so thick.

Iommic Pope wrote:Two cheap 412s are floating around and I'm finding the temptation to sell my orange 212 and nab one of them to refit with decent speakers too much to resist.
One is a laney GS412IS. $250AU. Has shitty cel. 70/80s.
The other is a Hiwatt HG412, that moose already poopooed, but is made out of ply and identical in dimensions and features to the expensive hiwatt cabs. Probably also made in china, but everything (almost) we get on the Oz market is. Could get it for $300, has hiwatt not-faners in it. (Moose, I know you know your shit, but construction-wise, I'm finding it real hard to split the diff on those hiwatt cabs. Both are the same ply according to the hiwatt site, the cheap one has segmented internal bracing behind the front baffle, but seems to be in all the critical spots. However I've seen new orange cabs with the same technique, so I dunno what to go with there. Seems like the same shit, just without a primo label. From what I can tell from wordworking dudes is that dovetails and the like don't really make a cab stronger, they just look good, moot point here as: tolex. If they even do that on their fancy expensive new ones.)
Ok, so that's gonna start some arguments.
I know what whiskey and summit are gonna say...I'm kinda with them.
But if there's something critically wrong with them, like they were made in a death labour camp where Black Sabbath records were burnt while the Old Testament was read then I won't go there.

I think the Laney Cabs are generally good cabs, but bad speakers...even the cheaper IRT cabs are good cabs but horrible speakers.

i have never owned any hiwatt cabs, but i do play through them sometimes at rehearsals, and to me they seem very flimsy and lack any depth in the sound...ofcourse the amps and the speakers have a lot to do with it...so take that advice with a grain of salt.

If it was me...i would go with Laney

Edit: shit, i just looked up those Laney cabs, and they are built for the GH amp range...i would definitely go with the Laney's

conky wrote:

Forgot a second cable so I wasn't able to run a dual rig but the Matamp on its own sounds so huge.

JIIZZZZZZZ

I mean, cool stack man.

What do you guys think of the Celestion g12k-85s?

same as k-100's decent speakers.

I have them in my cab and theyre totally fucking explosive.

if you had the option between the marshall jcm 900 2100 or the laney gh100...which one would you do? with primary focus being good clean channel and good pedal platform?

i have a good feel for the GH100, but never played or heard that JCM900 before.

BTW...already posted on FCoAW...so if you've already seen this over there, i apologize for doubling up.