a bit off topic, but why did fender have to mess up the best thing about the jazzmaster on the Classic Player... the string length behind the bridge... err forever will piss me off!
Radiohead625 wrote:a bit off topic, but why did fender have to mess up the best thing about the jazzmaster on the Classic Player... the string length behind the bridge... err forever will piss me off!
I've played both, and don't see what the fuss is about. A shorter string length behind the bridge lowers the break angle a bit, reduces buzz, and still lets you do behind the bridge type nonsense. The sound difference is going to be unnoticeable to most people.
Radiohead625 wrote:a bit off topic, but why did fender have to mess up the best thing about the jazzmaster on the Classic Player... the string length behind the bridge... err forever will piss me off!
Because Fender are Fender, and they havent designed a new guitar since, what, 1982?
Radiohead625 wrote:a bit off topic, but why did fender have to mess up the best thing about the jazzmaster on the Classic Player... the string length behind the bridge... err forever will piss me off!
Because Fender are Fender, and they havent designed a new guitar since, what, 1982?
Jagstang Katana Performer Toronado Jagmaster
To name a few, there are also some super-strats, but I didn't include those.. Some of these look a lot like other Fenders of course..
Radiohead625 wrote:a bit off topic, but why did fender have to mess up the best thing about the jazzmaster on the Classic Player... the string length behind the bridge... err forever will piss me off!
I've played both, and don't see what the fuss is about. A shorter string length behind the bridge lowers the break angle a bit, reduces buzz, and still lets you do behind the bridge type nonsense. The sound difference is going to be unnoticeable to most people.
the trems less smooth feels like your holding a stiff cock in your hand
Radiohead625 wrote:a bit off topic, but why did fender have to mess up the best thing about the jazzmaster on the Classic Player... the string length behind the bridge... err forever will piss me off!
I've played both, and don't see what the fuss is about. A shorter string length behind the bridge lowers the break angle a bit, reduces buzz, and still lets you do behind the bridge type nonsense. The sound difference is going to be unnoticeable to most people.
The scalelength behind the bridge is totally different, so the shorter the string behind the bridge, the higher the sound is resonating your string to the pick-up..
I've run across them. People are weird and do weird things. Looks like a Mustang that sat on the radiator to me, though -- yech.
If I saw one for ridiculously cheap. though, I'd get it for the Mustang scale and trem since I don't have one of those. Definitely a new pickguard and straight-up Mustang/Duo pickups, though.
Oh, and the Venus is almost as ugly. I'd only hit the XII, and that's just 'cause they did the right thing on the pickups. No reason I would ever mess with the Venus six string unless it magically happened to be the best guitar ever.
D.o.S. wrote:Broadly speaking, if we at ILF are dropping 300 bucks on a pedal it probably sounds like an SNES holocaust.
friendship wrote:death to false bleep-blop
UglyCasanova wrote:brb gonna slap my dick on my stomp boxes
I was afraid to say it, but the Jagstang and Venus look like butt I saw a Squier Katana in a dude's flea market store a couple months ago though someone had started refinishing it and apparently gave up. That dude also had a Gibson amp from the 60s and MIA P bass/Strat...REALLY unusual for a flea market around here.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Louy7zH9guw
sonidero wrote:Roll a plus 13 for fire and with my immunity to wack I dodge the cough and pass a turn to chill and look at these rocks...
kbithecrowing wrote:Making out with my girl friday night, I couldn't stop thinking about flangers.