weed_killer wrote:mine's a stock one, 78-81 era (never bothered to check). Do you find that each one has its own character? I owned another '78 once and it had a different vibe to it.
Yes, these are my findings with the vintage units. Each one has its own mystique and dominant characteristics, because internally they're all similar...yet different.
Some use ceramic caps *here* and poly caps *there* while others will swap them vice versa, and then other units will use all ceramic or all poly...etc.
Then there's the transistor (the old units use one, in the pre-amp stage?)...and its gain/leakage surely influences the overall sound.
The power transformer as well, there was less uniformity and greater impurities in the wire/windings of the old ones.
Finally, the workmanship of the individual who built and tuned the circuit around whichever components ultimately found their way inside...and how the tolerances have drifted in the 3+ decades since being manufactured.
I currently have 4 DMMs with a 5th on the way, all 5 knobber/pre-bankruptcy models.
There is no transferrable setting[s] between them, one unit's knob positions sound different in another; sometimes subtle other times glaring.
I've been putting money into a recording setup so (among other things) I can better demonstrate some of these observations.
As much as ILF, the DMM is my favorite pedal and among the most intriguing effects ever designed. Howard "Mick" Davis is an American hero.
cedarskies wrote:not enough DMM
My mantra
